Calc Function

  • Diagnosis
  • Rule Out
  • Prognosis
  • Formula
  • Treatment
  • Algorithm
  • Disease
    Select...
    Specialty
    Select...
    Chief Complaint
    Select...
    Organ System
    Select...

    Kocher Criteria for Septic Arthritis

    Distinguishes septic arthritis from transient synovitis in a child with an inflamed hip.

    Result:

    Please fill out required fields.
    Dr. Mininder S. Kocher
    Dr. Mininder S. Kocher
    From the creator
    Why did you develop the Kocher Criteria? Was there a clinical experience that inspired you to create this tool for clinicians?
    The prediction rule was actually my thesis project for my MPH in Clinical Epidemiology from the Harvard School of Public Health. It was inspired from my clinical experience as a resident and fellow trying to differentiate between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children in the emergency department. This could often be a vexing diagnosis as the patients often presented similarly with atraumatic hip pain, limp, and fever. However, the differentiation is essential since septic arthritis is a surgical emergency with the potential for a poor outcome such as septic necrosis of the hip, whereas transient synovitis is treated with observation and has a generally benign outcome. The goal of the prediction rule was to make the diagnosis in a more accurate, reliable, and timely manner.
    What pearls, pitfalls and/or tips do you have for users of the Kocher Criteria? Are there cases when it has been applied, interpreted, or used inappropriately?
    The prediction rule was developed for the hip in children. It has been used for other joints such as the knee, however it was not developed for the knee and may not be valid. Also it was not developed in infants or adults, so it may not apply to these populations.
    What recommendations do you have for health care providers once they have applied the Kocher Criteria? Are there any adjustments or updates you would make to the score given recent changes in medicine, like CRP, ultrasound, or imaging?
    Prediction rules are not meant to replace clinical judgment. Rather, they are designed as a tool in aiding diagnosis. So I would still rely on your clinical judgement. If it’s a case of septic arthritis of the hip where missing the diagnosis of septic arthritis can have devestating consequences, I would recommend on erring on the side of caution. If in doubt, aspirate the hip to make the definitive diagnosis! In our emergency department setting at Boston Children's Hospital, we routinely use ultrasound. If there is an effusion and there is a risk of septic arthritis, we usually aspirate under ultrasound guidance, although this may require sedation.
    Your criteria currently weighs all predictors equally. As more data has come in, do you think some criteria should be weighed more heavily than others?
    Our original prediction rule utilized ESR as CRP was not available at that time. Other studies, and our experience as well, has shown that CRP is an important predictor. CRP and ESR covary as they are measuring similar entities. Therefore, CRP (>2.0 mg/dL) could replace ESR in the prediction rule. However, the overall prediction performance is similar with CRP or ESR.
    Some subsequent prospective studies of the Kocher criteria have found much lower sensitivities than your original studies. Do you have any theories as to why it performed less well in certain populations?
    A prediction rule is an multivariate model that is idealized to the initial derivation data set. Therefore, it will always show decreased diagnostic performance in new data sets. In our validation study and in many other studies, the prediction rule has shown very good prediction as measured by the area under the ROC curve. A prediction rule may show decreased diagnostic performance in a new patient population for multiple reasons: differences in bacteria, differences in patient populations, differences in laboratory technique, and differences in hospital demographics.
    Any other comments? Any new research or papers on this topic in the pipeline?
    We have developed a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of patients with septic arthritis of the hip once the diagnosis has been made to reduce variability and improve efficiency of care:

    We have looked at the presentation of Lyme arthritis of the hip which can mimic septic arthritis of the hip:

    We have also looked at differentiating MRSA vs MSSA osteomyelitis in children:

    About the creator

    Mininder S. Kocher, MD, MPH, is a professor of orthopaedic surgery at Harvard Medical School, associate director of the Division of Sports Medicine at Children’s Hospital Boston. He has co-authored numerous articles and several books, most recently Operative Techniques: Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery. Dr. Kocher has particular interests in anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients, osteochondritis dissecans, articular cartilage injuries, tibial spine fractures, and many other topics.

    Content Contributors
    • Calvin Hwang, MD
    About the Creator
    Dr. Mininder S. Kocher
    Dr. Mininder S. Kocher
    You might be interested in...
    Partner Content
    EB Medicine
    Content Contributors
    • Calvin Hwang, MD